When I joined the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity in January, it was the first job-creation agency in the state to have a digital assistant, an office where they could send job applications and make phone calls with an iPad, a computer and a pen.
The digital assistant was a big deal because it helped them cut through the bureaucratic red tape that was plaguing the agency’s website.
Now the state has one, too.
But as the unemployment rate continues to fall, that assistant may not be as useful.
Statewide, the unemployment is at a record low of 8.6%, down from 10.9% in November.
It’s not because people are working fewer hours or staying home less.
But it’s because Florida is the first state in the country to eliminate the “unemployed” label in its unemployment rate.
The new, revised rate is what it was before.
For Florida, the new rate is the lowest in nearly a decade.
But that doesn’t mean Florida’s job market is healthier.
That’s because it’s a “continuous recovery,” meaning that more people are employed and looking for work.
But in many states, like New York and Texas, the job market has been weakening and the unemployment rates remain high.
And that’s where the data has some interesting lessons.
In December, The Wall Street Journal published a story titled “Jobless Rates Rise in U.S. in January as Job Creation Still Slow.”
That article detailed a massive drop in unemployment that was “the most dramatic since December 2008.”
The unemployment rate rose to 7.9%.
It was the lowest rate since June 2011.
But the story also noted that the “number of people seeking jobs has fallen in each of the past five months, to the lowest level since March 2011.”
That means Florida is experiencing a “recovered job market.”
The reason for the recovery is simple: the economy has been growing and the economy is creating jobs.
The problem is, most Americans don’t realize that the economy isn’t growing.
Instead, they see it growing slowly, slowly and steadily.
The WSJ article cited a study by the Economic Policy Institute and The Urban Institute, both nonpartisan economic think tanks, that found the unemployment increase is due to a decline in workers’ wages.
But what economists don’t tell Americans is that the number of people receiving government benefits and the number receiving unemployment benefits have also declined, as the WSJ piece pointed out.
For example, in January 2017, the U.N. Department of Labor released the first data set to measure the number and rate of people out of work, which showed the unemployment level in Florida had dropped from 13.9 percent in November to 7 percent in January.
That number is also down from October 2016 when the unemployment was 12.5 percent.
The U.C. San Diego Labor Center report also pointed out that “the number of part-time workers employed by employers has fallen over the past year.”
That includes people who were hired by companies that had laid off employees.
In December, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that the unemployment for people working part-timers fell from 9.2 percent to 7% over the same period.
So why is it that the U-verse of the UBS Group has been so successful at finding new workers?
One of the main reasons is that they’ve been able to hire more of them.
“The reason is that when the economy slows down, when people can’t find work, they look for another job,” said Matt D’Alessandro, a senior economist at UBS.
He said there’s been a lot of churn at the job-creating industries in Florida.
But, he said, the numbers are looking positive.
The good news is that Florida has found ways to attract and retain more people than ever before.
According to the UCCS, the state’s economy added a record-high 5.6 million jobs last year, which is the second-largest increase in the nation behind only California.
That growth is being driven by the fact that many of the companies that were hiring people before have gone out of business.
Florida’s economy also saw a significant increase in people in their 20s and 30s who are currently looking for jobs.
But while the state is looking to attract more people, the good news isn’t limited to Florida.
The U.K. also has a booming economy and many companies have already laid off workers.
But according to The Economist, Britain has seen its unemployment drop from 9% in October to just 5.5% now.
That means the UBR Group has found another reason to be optimistic.
“There are so many good jobs, there is so much opportunity,” D’Angelo said.
“But I think if we all just worked together we could make the most of it.”
Trump’s decision to ban Muslim immigrants from the United States will not solve the immigration crisis, the president said Wednesday.
The president also rejected any suggestion that his order was discriminatory or that it discriminates against any religion, saying he will enforce the ban on Muslims regardless of religion.
“The Muslim ban is not going to solve this issue,” Trump said during a press conference on the second day of a three-day trip to Israel and the West Bank.
“It’s not going, and I will enforce it.
And it’s not only going to be enforced by me, it’s going to go by my administration.
And by my generals, and by my military.”
He added that the ban was intended to prevent terrorism.
“We’re not going around and saying, ‘Oh, we have a problem with Muslims,'” Trump said.
“This is not about Muslims.”
The president’s comments come as his administration and congressional leaders continue to debate the legality of the order and how to deal with the impact on the economy and American workers.
He said Wednesday that his administration was not going “anywhere, anyplace” in implementing the ban.
Trump, who is set to return to Washington for his first overseas trip as president, has faced a backlash from the public and the country.
He is also under pressure to take concrete steps to reverse the fallout from the ban, such as releasing a long-form birth certificate and providing additional information about religious groups that were denied entry.
The American Civil Liberties Union said in a statement Wednesday that it has filed a lawsuit on behalf of several Muslim American groups seeking to challenge the order.
The group also released a video showing a young girl asking the president what is wrong with the U.S. and asking for her father to “come home to me.”
“You’re supposed to protect your country,” the young woman said, and then asked the president if he wants to stop Muslims from entering the country and behead them.
“I want to come home to my dad,” Trump replied.
“He wants to come back to me.
We can’t have this happening.”
The administration has not yet responded to requests for comment.
On Wednesday, Trump said the U,S.
was going to build a wall along the U.,S.-Mexico border and stop the flow of illegal immigrants, and he promised to protect American workers, who he said would be the first to be harmed by his order.
He also said that the Muslim ban was a “bad idea.”
“I’ve been saying this for a long time, this is a bad idea,” Trump told reporters at the White House.
“People don’t understand what I’m saying, but I mean, the Muslim immigration issue is a very, very, serious problem.”
The order, signed on Jan. 27, temporarily suspends immigration from Syria, Iraq, Iran, Sudan, Somalia, Libya and Yemen.
It also bans all refugees for 120 days and indefinitely suspends the admission of refugees from Syria.
The order was widely criticized by religious and civil rights groups and others.
Trump’s order sparked an uproar at the United Nations, which called the policy an attempt to discriminate against Muslims.
Trump and his advisers also drew a sharp contrast with former President Barack Obama’s administration.
The former president signed a similar order in 2015 that was quickly blocked by the courts.
Trump has defended his order as a necessary measure to keep Americans safe, despite opposition from many civil rights and faith groups.
“A lot of people have said to me, ‘Well, if you really believe this is going to keep people out, what are you going to do?’,” Trump joked.
“And I said, ‘What am I going to tell them?
They’re already here, and they’re not coming back.’
And I said to myself, ‘They’re not welcome here.
“Some of these people are very, great people, and it’s very, extremely disappointing,” Trump added. “
“Because I don’t want to hear them say, ‘I don’t like you, you’re not a good person, I don”
Some of these people are very, great people, and it’s very, extremely disappointing,” Trump added.
“Because I don’t want to hear them say, ‘I don’t like you, you’re not a good person, I don
FourFourFourSecond s uis a major theme in this year’s US presidential campaign.
It is, after all, the countrys fourth-largest single source of unemployment.
And yet, despite the fact that the US has been the biggest contributor of job loss since the Great Recession, it is only in the past six months that it has seen a sharp decline.
In October, for instance, the unemployment rate dropped by 1.2 percentage points.
This is the lowest level of joblessness since the recession began.
In November, the rate dropped again to 1.1 per cent.
So why is the unemployment number falling?
What explains it?
The US has had a relatively strong job market.
In the last year, the jobless rate has fallen by 0.7 percentage points and the number of jobs created by businesses has increased by 2.1 million.
This has led to a fall in the unemployment gap between the unemployed and the job-seekers.
That has led the US to see an unemployment rate that is below its historical average of 4.4 per cent and a labour force participation rate that has held steady at 73 per cent for most of this decade.
But this has come with a cost.
Unemployment has become increasingly stressful.
The recession has hit the job market harder than ever.
The unemployment rate has been declining for six months in a row and it has dropped to below 4 per cent in some states.
In other words, the economy is in a better position to absorb the losses than it was when the recession was at its peak.
But it has also seen job losses in some other areas, including construction, healthcare, retail and construction.
In all, nearly 30 million people have lost their jobs.
The problem is that the job losses are being concentrated among a small group of workers, often younger people, in a narrow range of industries.
Some of these jobs have been lost because the companies that employed them have closed or they have gone out of business.
Others are being lost because there has been no new construction to replace them.
In short, the jobs lost in the last recession are not evenly distributed across the population.
Some jobs are being absorbed by younger workers and others by older workers, with more concentrated and costly losses.
This means that the labour force is not being evenly distributed and, therefore, the labour market is not providing sufficient job opportunities for people.
There are three main reasons for this.
The first is that, despite being able to pay workers more, the majority of those who lose their jobs are not getting the full amount.
They are getting less than the minimum wage.
Many of these people are younger, college-educated people, and the gap between their pay and the minimum wages is often large.
For instance, many of those people working in the construction industry were in their early 20s when the construction boom ended and the unemployment benefits began to kick in.
Some had only recently completed their post-secondary education and were therefore not yet well prepared to cope with rising unemployment and to adjust to higher wages.
This group is also likely to be disproportionately impacted by the cost of healthcare and other essential benefits.
The second problem is the level of pay, which is much higher than the unemployment compensation, and it is being paid disproportionately to older workers.
For example, those older workers who are still in the workforce are being paid an average of $8.63 an hour more than the average wage for all workers aged 25 to 54.
This gap in pay means that these older workers are being put in an economic position that they will not be able to adapt to.
The third factor is the extent to which people are not being paid the full wage.
It seems likely that the real number of people who are being left out of the recovery is much lower than the official unemployment rate.
The official unemployment figure is based on a series of measures of wage growth, including changes in wages paid to hourly workers and changes in their hours worked.
However, these measures are based on an incomplete picture of the economy, which does not take into account the effects of unemployment insurance, temporary layoff notices and other labour market interventions.
They do not take account of the effects on people’s hours, which may be higher or lower than what is being recorded in the official statistics.
There is a growing consensus that the true unemployment rate is much, much higher.
For the past few years, the Federal Reserve has been increasingly confident that the official rate of unemployment is closer to 4.5 per cent than 4.0 per cent, and so it is now publishing monthly data on the state of the US labour market.
The US labour-market picture is very different from the official picture.
The Federal Reserve recently reported that the unemployment numbers are not as bad as the official figure suggests.
The real unemployment rate was 4.7 per cent as of the end of March, down from 4.8 per cent the previous month and down from 5.1 percentage